TAXATION AND TRANSFER PRICING FOR FOREIGN COMPANIES IN INDIA

Foreign entities seeking to establish a presence in the Indian market face significant challenges due to the complex regulatory environment designed for special circumstances. Navigating multi-layered compliance requirements and interpreting applicable tax laws can be daunting. This complexity partly arises because India, as a rapidly evolving economy, is continually adapting its regulatory framework to protect both the domestic economy and foreign investors’ interests.

India’s status as one of the fastest-growing economies makes it an attractive destination for global investment. However, the structure of Direct and Indirect Taxation demands careful and diligent management, as non-compliance can lead to severe consequences. The regulatory landscape includes strict adherence to tax laws, evolving foreign direct investment policies, and increased scrutiny from authorities like the Central Board of Direct Taxes and the Reserve Bank of India. Foreign companies must carefully follow these rules to avoid penalties and ensure smooth operations.

Overall, while India offers significant growth opportunities, foreign companies must invest considerable effort into understanding and complying with the country’s tax and regulatory systems, balancing the dynamic economic environment and evolving legal frameworks.

TAXATION FRAMEWORK FOR FOREIGN BUSINESS IN INDIA

Foreign corporations are taxed on the income only which arises or accrues in India or is considered to arise or accrue in India. Corporate tax on foreign corporations is charged at a fixed rate of 40%, along with surcharge and health and education cess as may be applicable. This is much more than the tax rate levied on domestic companies, and foreign investors must consider this in their budget estimates.

If a foreign company has a business connection or a Permanent Establishment (hereinafter referred as “PE”) in India, the income attributable to that connection or PE is taxable and assessable in India. This means that the profits generated from activities linked to the PE or business connection within India fall under Indian tax jurisdiction and must be reported and taxed accordingly. The concept is based on Indian tax laws and international tax treaties, which treat the PE as a separate taxable entity for attributing income, regardless of the foreign company’s global financial performance

Additionally, Indian tax authorities closely monitor transactions with foreign companies for keeping a check on tax evasion. This is particularly so in industries where cross-border service agreements, licensing deals, and franchise models are prevalent. Overlooking the Indian tax nexus can lead to significant penalties and long-drawn litigation.

Indirect taxes like Goods and Services Tax (hereinafter referred as “GST”) also apply to foreign companies in India because services provided by them are considered imports into the country. Foreign companies with long-term operations or a PE in India must register for GST as regular taxpayers. In contrast, foreign companies with short-term operations or temporary offices only pay GST on taxable services when remitted and can register as Non-Resident Taxable Persons (hereinafter referred as “NRTPs”). NRTPs require temporary GST registration, which generally lasts 90 days (extendable), and may have to pay estimated tax liabilities in advance.

Additionally, the Reverse Charge Mechanism (hereinafter referred as “RCM”) applies, whereby if a foreign company provides services, it is treated as an import of service, and the Indian recipient entity is liable to pay the GST under RCM. This framework ensures clarity in GST obligations based on the duration and nature of the foreign company’s presence and operations in India. This reframed explanation aligns with Indian GST provisions distinguishing between foreign companies with permanent establishments and NRTPs, detailing registration requirements, tax payment timing, and RCM application

TRANSFER PRCING REGULATIONS IN INDIA

Transfer Pricing in India requires foreign firms to follow fair pricing rules, keep records, and resolve disputes amid strict audits. Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, all cross-border transactions between related enterprises must adhere to the arm’s length principle, meaning prices for goods, services, loans, or intellectual property transferred between associated parties should reflect fair market value as if the parties were independent. This regulatory framework covers not only tangible goods but also intangibles, intra-group services, cost-sharing arrangements, and corporate guarantees.

Foreign companies operating in India through subsidiaries or Joint Ventures are required to maintain comprehensive documentation, including a transfer pricing study report, to substantiate the pricing of international transactions. Indian transfer pricing rules also encompass “Specified Domestic Transactions” (SDTs), which refer to transactions between Indian entities under common control or ownership, subject to transfer pricing norms when exceeding prescribed thresholds.

Transfer pricing disputes are common, typically involving royalty payments, management fees, and marketing intangibles. Courts often side with tax authorities when documentation is inadequate or pricing appears arbitrary. Indian tax authorities are known for their rigorous transfer pricing audits.

To provide certainty and relief for compliant taxpayers, mechanisms such as Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) and Mutual Agreement Procedures (MAPs) under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) are available. Additionally, recent reforms like multi-year block assessments and expanded safe harbour rules introduced in the 2025 Finance Bill aim to reduce litigation and bring clarity to transfer pricing compliance.

STRATEGIC PLANNING AND  ADVANTAGES OF DTAAs

India has signed comprehensive DTAAs with more than 90 jurisdictions to avoid double taxation on the same income by foreign business concerns. These agreements are central to international tax planning as they bring transparency to tax rates, jurisdictional rights to tax, and procedural arrangements for tax relief. For example, under the majority of DTAAs, business profits of a foreign firm are subject to taxation in India only where the firm has a permanent establishment in India. Even for passive income like royalties, interest, or dividends, the tax rates payable under the treaty are usually lower than domestic rates.

But to take advantage of DTAAs, foreign firms would be required to provide a Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) issued by the authorities of their home country. Additional documents, including Form 10F and beneficial ownership declaration, may be required by some treaties. Indian Revenue authorities have been known to verify such claims stringently, particularly for Mauritius, Singapore, and Cyprus, which have traditionally been popular for treaty shopping. Additionally, General Anti-Avoidance Rules (hereinafter referred as “GAAR”) now authorize tax officials to refuse treaty benefits if they believe that the main aim of a transaction was to achieve tax advantages. Legal guidance is thus important when organizing business operations to be treaty-compliant and reduce risk under GAAR.

PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT AND ITS TAX IMPLICATION

The concept of a PE is fundamental in determining the tax liability of a foreign company in India. A PE refers to a fixed place of business through which a foreign enterprise wholly or partly conducts its business in India, which could include a branch office, factory, project site, or even a dependent agent habitually securing orders on its behalf. When a PE exists, the income attributable to that establishment is taxable in India, covering not only sales profits but also related services and supply chain activities.

Recently, Indian tax authorities have broadened the concept of PE to include digital presence and virtual operations, particularly targeting sectors such as e-commerce, gaming, and software services. Traditionally, PE referred to a fixed physical place of business through which a foreign company carries out its operations in India, such as a branch or factory. However, with the rapid growth of digital business models that generate significant economic activity without a physical footprint, India introduced the Significant Economic Presence (hereinafter referred as “SEP”) rule.

The SEP, introduced under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, defines a business connection based on specified revenue and user engagement thresholds, even if the foreign company lacks a physical establishment in India. This expansion aligns with the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (hereinafter referred as “BEPS”) project, which aims to adapt international tax rules to the realities of the digital economy. BEPS challenges arrangements where companies artificially avoid PE status to evade tax. India’s move allows tax authorities to tax foreign digital enterprises based on their economic presence rather than mere physical presence.

However, enforcement complexities remain because India’s DTAAs mostly still define PE in traditional terms, requiring a physical presence. Until treaties are updated, the SEP rule applies domestically and may be limited in taxing companies from treaty countries without physical PE.

The Multilateral Instrument (MLI) further modifies treaty provisions by introducing rules on commissionaire arrangements and anti-fragmentation, increasing the likelihood that a foreign business will be deemed to have a PE. Therefore, foreign enterprises must strategically structure their operations to address both commercial and tax considerations, while carefully managing PE-related documentation and compliance requirements.

CHALLENGES FACED BY FOREIGN BUSINESSES IN INDIA

Despite genuine efforts in tax compliance, foreign firms often face challenges integrating into India’s complex regulatory environment. Common issues include delays in obtaining tax registrations, ambiguity in classifying goods and services, prolonged transfer pricing disputes, and uncertainty surrounding the application of GAAR. Frequent changes in tax laws, such as the introduction of the equalization levy on digital services and ongoing modifications to GST regulations make consistent compliance difficult.

Additionally, stringent audit practices by tax authorities can lead to significant demands, adversely affecting cash flow and investor confidence. In such a scenario, engaging experienced professionals well-versed in the Indian tax landscape becomes crucial, as they help ensure meticulous documentation, effective tax planning, and risk mitigation.

CONCLUSION

India is still a profitable market for foreign investment, but it takes a clear-eyed understanding of India’s tax environment to succeed here. From corporate taxation implications and transfer pricing regulations to coping with GST and availing benefits of DTAAs, each of them needs a strategic maneuvering with legal and financial knowledge.

With careful planning, a solid grasp of regulatory subtleties, and ongoing compliance, foreign companies can not only succeed in India but capitalize on its convoluted tax system as a competitive strength. As a multinational looking to enter or expand into India, investing in sound international tax planning and legal counsel specific to your business model is not just recommended; it is necessary.

CONNECT

To know more or to discuss further, you may conenct with us on info@amlegals.com or call on boardline at 91-8448548549.