- Email: info@amlegals.com
- Boardline : +91-8448548549
- Offices: Ahmedabad | Bengaluru | Chennai | Mumbai | New Delhi | Kolkata | Prayagraj | Pune | Surat
Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) empowers operational creditors to initiate a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against defaulting corporate debtors before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). This mechanism is a powerful remedy, but its success hinges on strict compliance with statutory procedures and documentation.
Operational Creditors: Any person or entity to whom an operational debt is owed by a corporate debtor can file, provided there is no pre-existing dispute regarding the debt.
Issue Demand Notice:
Serve a demand notice (Form 3) or a copy of the invoice (Form 4) to the corporate debtor, seeking payment of the outstanding operational debt.
The debtor has 10 days to:
Pay the debt,
Raise a dispute, or
Provide proof of payment.
No Pre-existing Dispute:
Section 9 cannot be invoked if there is an ongoing dispute or litigation regarding the debt prior to the notice.
If the debtor fails to pay within 10 days of the demand notice, the operational creditor may file a Section 9 application before the NCLT.
A Section 9 application must be comprehensive and include:
Form 5: Application form as per IBBI (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016.
Copy of Demand Notice: Proof of service of demand notice or invoice (Form 3/4).
Affidavit: Stating that no notice of dispute has been received.
Proof of Default: Bank statements, correspondence, or other evidence.
Certificate from Financial Institution: Confirming non-payment, if available.
Vakalatnama: Authorization for legal representation.
Index, Memo of Parties, Synopsis, List of Dates & Events, Exhibits: As per NCLT filing standards.
Court Fee: As per current NCLT schedule (typically Rs 2,000 for Section 9).
Language: English, or with an English translation if in another Indian language.
Format: Double-spaced, specified margins, paginated, indexed, and stitched as a paper book.
Electronic Filing: Bulky documents may be filed electronically; always check latest NCLT and IBBI rules.
Examination: NCLT will scrutinize the application for completeness, proof of debt and default, service of demand notice, and absence of pre-existing disputes.
Admission: If all requirements are met, NCLT admits the application, imposes a moratorium, and appoints an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
Rejection: If defects exist, NCLT may allow 7 days for rectification or reject the application.
Hearing: The corporate debtor is given an opportunity to respond and present evidence of payment or dispute.
IBC is Not a Debt Recovery Tool: Section 9 is for insolvency resolution, not mere debt collection. Applications filed solely for recovery are likely to be dismissed.
Limitation Period: Application must be filed within three years from the date the cause of action arises (after the 10-day notice period).
Withdrawal: Applications can be withdrawn before admission with NCLT approval; post-admission, withdrawal requires 90% Committee of Creditors’ consent (if constituted).
Incomplete or improper documentation.
Failure to serve a valid demand notice or prove delivery.
Application filed after limitation period.
IBC Experts: Deep experience in drafting, filing, and litigating Section 9 applications across all NCLT benches in India.
Strategic Advisory: Assessment of dispute risks, limitation, and compliance for successful admission.
End-to-End Support: From notice drafting to NCLT hearings and IRP appointments.
Pan-India Presence: Local expertise, national reach.
If you are an operational creditor seeking to initiate insolvency proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC, You may contact AMLEGALS on merit of your application.
Q1: What is the minimum amount required to file a Section 9 application?
The default threshold is Rs 1 crore (subject to government notifications).
Q2: Can I file if the debtor disputes the invoice after receiving the demand notice?
Yes, it can be filed. It needs to be established by the debtor that there was a pre-existing dispute and not an after thought dispute on eceiving the notice.
Q3: Is a lawyer necessary for filing?
Professional legal expertise is highly recommended due to technical and procedural complexities.
The NCLT strictly examines whether a “pre-existing dispute” exists. Corporate debtors often try to create the illusion of a dispute to have the application dismissed. Our lawyers help you: