DPDPA compliance checklist. Twelve questions. One number.
This is not a marketing checklist. These are the twelve questions the Data Protection Board of India will ask you — in some form, in some order, on some Tuesday. Tick only what you can defend with evidence today. Watch the score change as you go. The number at the top is the same number your Board will see.
Your Live Readiness Score
Most companies score under 50% on first audit. The score is not the verdict — it is the starting point.
The 12 DPDPA Compliance Questions
-
i.
We have a defensible consent architecture with logged consent, granular purpose, and one click withdrawal
Consent must be free, specific, informed, unconditional, and unambiguous. Pre-ticked boxes are not consent.Section 6 · DPDPA -
ii.
Privacy notices are available in English plus 22 Indian languages as required by the Eighth Schedule
Notice must be in plain language and accessible in any of the languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution.Rule 3 · DPDP Rules 2025 -
iii.
A data inventory and processing map exists, is current within 90 days, and ties data to lawful basis
If you cannot answer "what personal data is where, processed for what purpose, on which lawful basis" in five minutes, you do not have a map.Section 8(7) · DPDPA -
iv.
A retention and deletion policy is enforced in code — not just documented in a policy PDF
Personal data must be erased once the purpose is served and no legal retention obligation applies. Manual deletion does not scale.Section 8(7) · Rule 8 -
v.
A Data Principal rights portal handles access, correction, erasure, and grievance — within statutory timelines
Email-based grievance redressal does not survive scrutiny. Rights must be exercisable through a published, auditable channel.Sections 11–14 · DPDPA -
vi.
A breach notification playbook exists with named owners, communication templates, and a 24 hour Board notification path
The Rules abolish the materiality threshold. Every personal data breach is reportable to the Data Protection Board and to affected Data Principals.Section 8(6) · Rule 7 -
vii.
Reasonable security safeguards are deployed — encryption, access logs, MFA, vendor controls, monitored continuously
Failure attracts the highest penalty tier — ₹250 Crore. Documentation is necessary but not sufficient. Operational evidence is the standard.Section 8(5) · DPDPA -
viii.
Every Data Processor and vendor is governed by a written DPDPA-compliant contract, with audit rights
Liability for processor failures sits with the Data Fiduciary. A vendor's breach is your breach unless your contract proves otherwise.Section 8(2) · DPDPA -
ix.
Children's data is handled with verifiable parental consent and zero behavioural targeting under 18
A checkbox is not verification. Government ID-linked verification or equivalent is the standard the Rules prescribe.Section 9 · Rule 10 -
x.
A clear cross border transfer position exists — including monitoring of the Central Government's negative list
DPDPA is permissive by default. The list of restricted destinations is dynamic. Continuous monitoring is part of the compliance posture.Section 16 · Rule 14 -
xi.
If we are an SDF — India based DPO, periodic DPIA, and independent audit are in place
Significant Data Fiduciary obligations are heavier. The threshold is set by the Central Government — and broad in practice.Section 10 · Rule 12 -
xii.
An evidence pack exists — minutes, logs, reviews, training records — that can be shared with the Board within 7 days
The Board's first request after a complaint is documentary. Operational evidence must be packaged before it is asked for.Section 28 · Powers of Inquiry
Four bands. One honest verdict.
The score above is descriptive, not exhaustive. Every "yes" must be defensible with evidence. The score helps you locate yourself on the AMLEGALS readiness curve. Where you sit decides what gets shipped first — and how much budget the board needs to release this quarter.
Smoking Privacy™ — Stage Five
Foundational obligations are missing. The penalty exposure is real and immediate. Diagnostic in the next two weeks is not optional.
Theatre Compliance
Privacy policy exists. Notice exists. Consent button exists. None of it is defensible in audit. The "yes" answers are aspirational, not operational.
The Working Quarter
Most controls are in place. A few load-bearing items are still informal. The 90 day sprint closes the gap before May 2027.
Operational Maturity
The program is defensible. The next move is privacy as a market position — converting compliance into competitive advantage. The Privacy Dividend™ stage.
"A checklist tells you where you are. A diagnostic tells you what to ship. The board needs both — and the regulator only respects the second."
— AMLEGALS · TCL Framework Position
If your score is under 80%, the diagnostic is overdue.
A self-audit produces a number. The diagnostic produces a defensible position. The two are not the same. Most companies find the gap between what they ticked and what they can actually defend is wider than they expected. Closing that gap before is what the next 18 months are for.
- Verified readiness score across all 12 dimensions, with evidence requirements per item.
- Quantified penalty exposure from your score, mapped to the five Schedule tiers.
- Prioritised remediation backlog. Highest exposure first. Fastest fixes called out.
- 90 day sprint plan. Owners, timelines, and the audit ready evidence pack at the close.
Get in Touch.
One conversation. Confidential. Bring the score from the top of this page. We will tell you which of the ticks are defensible and which are not.
