Data PrivacyData Minimisation to Protect Consumer Privacy in Retail

September 11, 20240

INTRODUCTION

In the digital age, recommendation systems and data analytics have revolutionized the retail business through the use of online shopping. Since many traditional and e-tailers gather large amounts of personal information to improve client’s experiences, the issue of privacy protection has never been more pressing.

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, (‘DPDPA’) 2023 requires that the data fiduciaries, i.e., the retailers, should only collect and process the personal data that is essential in its business and store it only where necessary. This mandate guarantees the consumer rights and enhances the business-consumer relationship.

DATA MINIMISATION UNDER THE DPDPA

The DPDPA has incorporated provisions on data minimization mainly on the collection, processing and retention of personal data. These provisions are meant to protect consumers information and guarantee that retailers and other data fiduciaries act appropriately.

Section 7(1) of DPDPA requires that every data fiduciary must process the personal data only in a manner that is relevant to the purpose for which such data has been processed. This provision has a great impact on current and future retailing, whether it is traditional or through the Internet. For example, an e-commerce platform that gathers customers’ information for the purpose of order delivery should only request basic information like customer’s name, their address, and payment information. The platform should avoid obtaining unrelated information such as history or preferences unless the reason for their need can be explained for the order fulfillment process.

This section makes retailers reflect on how they collect data. A store that has a loyalty program, has to make sure that it gathers only the necessary information about the customers for the program to work. Examples of information that would probably violate this provision include data on the customers’ family members or income levels if the company is not directly using it for the loyalty program.

Section 7(2) of the DPDPA deals with data retention and it states that no individual’s personal data shall be retained for longer than is necessary for the achievement of the purpose for which it was processed except where required by law. This provision has implications on the way in which retailers deal with customer information in the long run.

In the case of an online fashion retailer, it might mean storing customer’s order history and sizing preferences for a certain period to enable easy returns and exchanges, but not for eternity. After the return period has elapsed and after the warranty has been honoured, the retailer should have ways of eradicating this data or making it anonymous, in order to extract insights from the data post lapse of the retention period.

Likewise, a grocery chain that gathers customer details for a loyalty program where they offer discounts based on the customer’s previous purchases would have to determine retention periods. They may argue that it is necessary to retain recent purchase data to determine the current offers, but retaining transaction data that is years old would probably go beyond the need of the program.

This section also suggests that retailers have to put in place effective data management systems that are able to capture the age and use of data stored. For example, a chain of department stores would require frequent customer database check and subsequent cleansing of the data that is no longer relevant to its primary function.

These provisions have greater implications than that are confined to the letter of the law. It means a radical change in the way retailers deal with data gathering and analysis. Instead of the ‘collect and keep’ attitude, the companies need to transition to the ’collect only what is necessary’ and retain only for as long as necessary attitude.

Such a shift may cause massive changes in the operations of an organization. This could mean that retailers require redesigning of customer relationship management systems, changes in the privacy policies of the company and even staff training on data management. Although these changes may pose some problems at the beginning, they result to better management of data, low costs of storage and low probabilities of data loss.

Furthermore, by following these data minimization principles, the retailers can earn the trust of the customers. With the growing concern among consumers regarding their data privacy, it is possible to turn data responsibility into a competitive edge.

The implications of these provisions extend beyond mere compliance. They require a fundamental shift in how retailers approach data collection and management. Instead of the traditional “collect and keep” mindset, businesses must adopt a “collect only what’s necessary and keep only as long as needed” approach.

This shift can lead to significant operational changes. Retailers may need to redesign their customer relationship management systems, update their privacy policies, and retrain staff on data handling procedures. While these changes may present initial challenges, they ultimately lead to more efficient data management, reduced storage costs, and minimized risk of data breaches.

Moreover, by adhering to these data minimization principles, retailers can build stronger trust with their customers. In an era where consumers are increasingly aware and concerned about their data privacy, demonstrating a commitment to responsible data practices can become a competitive advantage.

DATA MINIMISATION IN RETAIL

Data minimisation entails that e-commerce businesses ought to only collect, process and store the personal data that is essential for their operations. Data minimization should be given high priority especially with the increase in online shopping where retailers have full information of their customers.

In the context of online retailers, data minimization has several objectives. First of all, it dramatically decreases the threat of leakage of personal information by reducing the amount of data that is to be stored. Secondly, it improves the customer trust since it shows that the company cares about the customers’ privacy. Thirdly, it eases data management procedures through which firms can easily adhere to the set legal standards. Finally, it can save costs in storing and processing of data in the organization.

E-Commerce giants gather all sorts of customer information, including basic contact information, shopping history and preferences. The act of data minimization would mean that they would have to analyse and assess every piece of data that they gather and store. For example, it is mandatory to take a customer’s address for delivery purposes, but it is not crucial to store all the customer’s browsing history forever for business processes.

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

To implement a comprehensive data minimization strategy in compliance with the DPDPA, online retailers should follow a structured approach. The first step is conducting a thorough data audit to identify all personal data currently being collected, processed, and stored. This audit should cover all touchpoints where customer data is gathered, including account creation, purchase transactions, marketing communications, and customer support interactions.

Once the audit is complete, retailers must define clear purposes for each type of data collected. The DPDPA mandates that data collection should be limited to what is necessary for the specified purpose. For example, collecting a customer’s date of birth might be justified for age verification in case of age-restricted products, but it may not be necessary for general merchandise sales.

Next, retailers should implement technical measures to enforce data minimization. This could involve redesigning data collection forms to only include essential fields, setting up automated data deletion processes for information that is no longer needed, and implementing data anonymization techniques where possible. For instance, a fashion retailer might anonymize purchase history data used for trend analysis, removing any personally identifiable information while still retaining valuable insights.

Training employees on data minimization principles is crucial. All staff members, especially those in customer-facing roles or involved in data processing, should understand the importance of collecting only necessary information and the potential risks of over-collection. Regular refresher courses and updates on data protection policies should be provided to ensure ongoing compliance.

Retailers must also establish clear data retention policies. The DPDPA stipulates that personal data should not be retained beyond the period necessary for the purpose for which it was collected. For an online retailer, this might mean retaining order details for the duration required by tax laws, but deleting or anonymizing this information once that period has elapsed.

Implementing robust consent management systems is another critical aspect of compliance. Under the DPDPA, consent for data collection must be specific, informed, and clear. Online retailers should design user-friendly interfaces that allow customers to easily understand what data is being collected and why, and provide granular consent options. For example, a customer might consent to share their email for order updates but opt out of marketing communications.

Regular reviews and audits of data minimization practices are essential to ensure ongoing compliance. As business needs evolve and new technologies emerge, retailers must continually assess whether their data collection and retention practices remain justified and necessary.

AMLEGALS REMARKS

One of the key drivers for consumer privacy protection is data minimization in the retail industry. This is particularly in relation to the DPDPA and accompanying rules. If a retailer should apply the principles of collecting only what is necessary, processing it judiciously, and retaining it for short periods, this will not only make them legally compliant but more trustworthy among customers.

This approach has tremendous value for ease of operations that are streamlined, cuts the risk of having a potential breach in data, and builds customer loyalty. Businesses will, therefore, increasingly have to adopt data minimization as the digital retail landscape continues to evolve at the complex crossroads of technology, commerce, and privacy. Only those retailers that proactively implement effective data minimization strategies are going to be in a position to compete in an increasingly privacy-conscious marketplace, while failure to adapt may result in serious legal and reputational consequences.

 

– Team AMLEGALS assisted by Mr. Satish Chandra Chitrapu (Intern)


For any queries of feedback, feel free to reach out to mridusha.guha@amlegals.com or @liza.vanjani@amlegals.com

 

 

© 2020-21 AMLEGALS Law Firm in Ahmedabad, Mumbai, Kolkata, New Delhi, Bengaluru for IBC, GST, Arbitration, Contract, Due Diligence, Corporate Laws, IPR, White Collar Crime, Litigation & Startup Advisory, Legal Advisory.

 

Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:
    • there has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;
    • user wishes to gain more information about AMLEGALS and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;
  • the information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site does not create any lawyer-client relationship; and that
  • We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused due to any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information, or its interpretation thereof.
However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources.