Data PrivacyData Privacy in The Context Of Aadhaar And India’s Digital Identity Systems

Introduction

In the digital age, the concept of digital identity systems has gained significant importance as more services, transactions, and interactions move online. A digital identity system refers to an electronic method of verifying an individual’s identity, enabling seamless access to various digital services. One of the most prominent examples is Aadhaar, the world’s largest biometric-based digital identity system, developed by the Government of India.

It was launched in 2009, whereby Aadhaar has transformed India’s governance and social welfare programs by offering a unique identification number to over billions residents. It utilizes biometric data, including fingerprints and iris scans, to create a secure and verifiable digital identity for individuals.

The primary goals of Aadhaar are to streamline service delivery, reduce fraud, and facilitate the Indian Government’s broader push towards digital transformation. By linking Aadhaar to various welfare programs and financial services, the Government aims to improve efficiency and transparency.

However, when Aadhaar was introduced, it faced significant scrutiny over privacy and surveillance concerns. Critics feared that the extensive collection of biometric data could be misused, raising alarms about data security and citizen’s right to privacy. Despite these concerns, Aadhaar has become a critical infrastructure in India’s digital economy, reshaping how citizens interact with public and private services.

Evolution of Aadhar: From Voluntary to Ubiquitous

Aadhaar was initially introduced in 2009 as a voluntary digital identity project aimed at providing a unique identification number to every Indian resident. Its primary objective was to ensure that Government subsidies and benefits reached the intended recipients by eliminating duplicate and fraudulent identities. However, over time, Aadhaar evolved from a voluntary program to becoming nearly mandatory for accessing a wide range of essential services.

This transformation was driven by Government policies that increasingly required Aadhaar for availing services such as opening bank accounts, filing income tax returns (by linking Aadhaar with PAN), and accessing welfare schemes like LPG subsidies and MGNREGA payments.

A crucial legal milestone in Aadhaar’s journey came in 2018 when the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment that affirmed the constitutional validity of Aadhaar but with significant limitations. The Court upheld the necessity of Aadhaar for availing Government subsidies and welfare programs but ruled against its mandatory use for private services, such as mobile connections or banking, and reinforced the right to privacy as a fundamental right.

Despite these legal boundaries, Aadhaar’s scope has continued to expand, with its integration into private sector services, including fintech and telecommunications. Today, Aadhaar has become deeply woven into India’s social, financial, and governance framework, making it a near-ubiquitous aspect of daily life.

Privacy Concerns Related to Aadhar

Since its inception, Aadhaar has faced significant scrutiny regarding privacy and data security. One of the primary concerns revolves around the potential for mass surveillance, data breaches, and unauthorized profiling due to the vast amount of personal information stored in Aadhaar’s centralized database. Several high-profile incidents have highlighted these vulnerabilities. While the Unique Identification Authority of India (“UIDAI”) has implemented security measures, concerns remain about the system’s overall resilience to cyberattacks and data breaches.

The centralized nature of the Aadhaar database, which links biometric data with various personal details, has raised alarms over its susceptibility to hacking. Critics argue that any compromise of this system could have far-reaching consequences, exposing individual’s sensitive data across multiple linked services, from banking to government welfare schemes. Moreover, the extensive integration of Aadhaar with various databases heightens the risk of unauthorized profiling. By linking Aadhaar to financial, medical, and social services, there is a legitimate fear that personal data could be used to surveillance or target individuals based on their activities or socio-economic background.

These concerns have fuelled public discourse and activism, with many privacy advocates and civil society organizations pushing back against Aadhaar’s widespread use. Although the 2018 Supreme Court ruling curtailed its mandatory application in certain sectors, privacy risks remain central to the debate around Aadhaar’s role in modern India.

Aadhar and India’s Largest Framework for Data Protection

As Aadhaar became deeply integrated into India’s governance and social systems, concerns about data privacy and protection escalated. In response, India has gradually built its legal framework for data protection, culminating in the recently passed Digital Personal Data Protection Act (“DPDPA”) 2023. The DPDPA aims to regulate how personal data is collected, stored, and processed, addressing some of the privacy concerns surrounding Aadhaar. While the Act establishes rules for obtaining consent, ensuring data security, and imposing penalties for breaches, its adequacy in dealing with Aadhaar-specific challenges remains under scrutiny.

Compared to global standards like the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) of the European Union, DPDP 2023 has several notable differences. While both laws seek to protect personal and biometric data, GDPR is seen as more stringent in terms of individual rights, especially regarding the “right to be forgotten” and data portability. DPDP, in contrast, offers limited recourse for citizens if Aadhaar-linked data is misused or compromised. Additionally, while GDPR mandates independent oversight bodies, the DPDP Act places significant control in the hands of government bodies, raising concerns about accountability.

The UIDAI, which oversees Aadhaar, is entrusted with ensuring data security within the Aadhaar system. However, there are ongoing debates about whether UIDAI has sufficient independence and resources to act as an effective data custodian. While the DPDPA provides some framework for safeguarding Aadhaar data, critics argue that gaps remain, particularly in addressing the widespread integration of Aadhaar across public and private sectors. Concerns persist that the current legal framework does not fully address issues like unauthorized profiling, surveillance, or the overreach of Aadhaar into citizen’s lives. Strengthening UIDAI’s oversight and aligning India’s laws more closely with global best practices will be crucial steps toward enhancing Aadhaar-related data protection.

Aadhaar and Data Minimization: Reality vs. Ideal

Data minimization, a key principle in privacy law, refers to the practice of collecting only the data that is necessary for a specific purpose, thereby limiting the risks associated with over-collection and misuse of personal information. In the context of Aadhaar, this principle has been a subject of significant debate. Aadhaar collects extensive biometric data, including fingerprints and iris scans, alongside demographic information such as name, address, and date of birth. While this data is necessary for uniquely identifying individuals and preventing identity fraud, critics argue that the amount of information gathered and stored goes beyond what is required for the services Aadhaar integrates with.

Despite the theoretical commitment to data minimization, the reality of Aadhaar’s implementation has raised concerns. For example, Aadhaar’s linkage with banking, telecommunications, and various government welfare schemes has resulted in the creation of a vast centralized database, which critics fear could be misused or become a target for data breaches.

There are questions about whether all this data is truly necessary for the services Aadhaar supports, such as verifying LPG subsidy eligibility or linking with the public distribution system. Moreover, privacy advocates argue that existing safeguards are insufficient to prevent excessive data collection and long-term storage, especially by private entities that have, at times, required Aadhaar verification unnecessarily.

Though the Supreme Court’s 2018 judgment attempted to restrict the scope of Aadhaar to only essential services, the widespread integration of Aadhaar into both government and private sectors raises concerns about how much data is truly needed versus what is being collected. To adhere to the principle of data minimization, stronger regulatory mechanisms are needed to ensure that only essential data is collected and stored, and that citizen’s privacy is safeguarded against potential overreach.

Interoperability and Data Sharing Risks

Aadhaar’s ability to facilitate interoperability between public and private sector services has significantly transformed how citizens access financial, healthcare, and governmental services in India. By linking Aadhaar to direct benefit transfers (“DBT”), subsidies, and welfare programs like healthcare and the public distribution system, the government has streamlined service delivery. Private sector entities, particularly in banking, telecommunications, and fintech, have also integrated Aadhaar for Know-Your-Customer (“KYC”) processes, making it a crucial tool for verifying identity.

However, this seamless integration has amplified privacy concerns due to the risks associated with extensive data sharing. When Aadhaar is linked across sectors, personal and biometric information flows between various entities  government agencies, banks, telecom providers, and even healthcare services. This interoperability creates the potential for unauthorized access, misuse, or profiling, as vast amounts of personal data are shared without proper oversight. For example, the widespread use of Aadhaar in financial services and telecommunications raises concerns about how much personal information is available to third parties and whether it is adequately protected against breaches or misuse.

The role of consent in data sharing is another critical issue. Although Aadhaar is designed to operate with user consent, in practice, consent is often not meaningfully obtained or respected. Many citizens feel compelled to share their Aadhaar details due to the essential nature of the services involved, leaving them with little control over how their data is used. While there are regulations in place to govern data sharing, critics argue that the current safeguards are insufficient to prevent privacy violations or ensure transparency.

Overall, Aadhaar’s interoperability has undoubtedly improved service delivery, but the privacy risks associated with the seamless flow of data between different entities remain a significant concern. Stronger oversight and clearer data-sharing guidelines are needed to ensure that personal information is handled responsibly and that individual’s rights to privacy are upheld.

Biometric Data: Storage, Protection, and Misuse

Biometric data, such as fingerprints and iris scans, is central to the Aadhaar system, making it one of the most advanced digital identity infrastructures in the world. However, the collection and storage of such sensitive data pose unique security and privacy challenges. Unlike passwords or personal information, biometric data is permanent and cannot be changed if compromised. This makes the protection of Aadhaar’s biometric information crucial, as breaches can have irreversible consequences, including identity theft, fraud, and unauthorized access to services.

Aadhaar’s biometric data is stored in a centralized database managed by the UIDAI. To safeguard this information, UIDAI has implemented several security measures, including encryption, data compartmentalization, and multi-factor authentication protocols. Despite these efforts, the system remains vulnerable to potential hacking and misuse. If biometric data were to be stolen or cloned, the risks are significantly higher than typical data breaches, as individuals cannot alter their biometric identifiers once compromised. This means that a single breach could lead to lifelong vulnerabilities for the affected individuals, making the consequences far more severe.

Instances of Aadhaar-related data leaks have raised concerns about the robustness of these security mechanisms. Even with encryption in place, hackers could potentially exploit weaknesses in the system, leading to unauthorized access to personal data. Additionally, once biometric data is in the hands of malicious actors, it can be used for identity fraud or to bypass security measures in systems that rely on fingerprint or iris authentication.

Globally, best practices for biometric data protection include decentralizing data storage, using advanced encryption techniques, and limiting access to biometric information strictly on a need-to-know basis. Moreover, ensuring that biometric data is never used as a standalone authentication method, but rather as part of a multi-layered security protocol, can help mitigate the risks. As Aadhaar continues to expand, adopting these best practices and reinforcing the protection of biometric data will be essential in preventing misuse and maintaining public trust in the system.

Aadhaar in the Context of Surveillance and Civil Liberties

Aadhaar, initially designed as a tool to improve service delivery and streamline welfare programs, has sparked significant debate regarding its potential as a mass surveillance tool. Critics argue that Aadhaar’s vast integration into everyday life linking it to banking, telecommunications, healthcare, and government subsidies creates a mechanism through which the Indian government could monitor citizen’s activities, transactions, and interactions across a wide range of services. While Aadhaar has undoubtedly contributed to reducing fraud and enhancing social welfare distribution, its broad scope raises concerns about the erosion of civil liberties, particularly when it comes to privacy and personal freedoms.

One of the primary concerns is that Aadhaar’s use in tracking individual’s interactions across various services could lead to the creation of detailed profiles of citizens. By linking Aadhaar to virtually every aspect of life, from financial transactions to mobile phones, the potential for real-time surveillance emerges, allowing for the tracking of citizens’ movements, purchasing behaviour, and communication patterns. While Aadhaar’s integration aims to facilitate efficient service delivery, critics warn that this level of data aggregation could be exploited for surveillance purposes, particularly if government or private entities misuse it.

For marginalized communities, these concerns are even more pronounced. Communities already vulnerable to discrimination—such as religious minorities, migrants, or economically disadvantaged groups—may be disproportionately targeted or monitored through Aadhaar-based tracking. This heightened surveillance could lead to further marginalization, with personal data being used to discriminate against certain groups or restrict their access to services. The fear of constant monitoring could also deter individuals from seeking certain services, exacerbating inequality.

Comparatively, concerns surrounding Aadhaar parallel fears associated with other global digital identity systems, such as China’s social credit system. In China, the social credit system uses vast amounts of personal data to monitor and evaluate citizen’s behaviour, affecting everything from access to public services to credit ratings. While Aadhaar does not explicitly function as a social credit system, its broad integration across various platforms raises concerns that, if misused, it could enable similar monitoring of citizens, limiting freedoms and curbing dissent.

In sum, the potential for Aadhaar to be used as a surveillance tool remains one of the most contentious aspects of the system. While its role in delivering social welfare and fostering digital transformation is undeniable, its ability to track citizens’ activities poses a significant threat to privacy and civil liberties. Striking a balance between leveraging Aadhaar for social good and ensuring it does not become a tool for surveillance will be critical as India continues to navigate its digital future. Stronger legal safeguards, accountability, and transparency are essential to ensure that Aadhaar remains a tool for empowerment, not control.

Technological Safeguards and Privacy Enhancing Technologies

To address privacy and security concerns surrounding Aadhaar, several technological safeguards have been implemented to protect users’ sensitive biometric and personal data. Privacy-enhancing technologies (“PETs”) such as encryption, tokenization, and virtual IDs have been introduced to mitigate the risks of data breaches, unauthorized access, and identity theft. However, while these measures are steps in the right direction, there are still limitations that require attention for stronger protection.

One of the core technological protections Aadhaar employs is encryption. The biometric and demographic data collected under Aadhaar is encrypted at every stage—during collection, transmission, and storage ensuring that the data is safeguarded from potential interception or misuse. Additionally, Aadhaar introduced virtual IDs (“VIDs”) as a layer of security.

These temporary, revocable 16-digit numbers can be used in place of an Aadhaar number to authenticate identity, reducing the risk of overexposure of permanent Aadhaar numbers. Tokenization is another privacy-enhancing measure, where Aadhaar numbers are replaced with unique tokens to anonymize personal data during transactions, thereby protecting the user’s core identity from being revealed.

Despite these advancements, there are still areas where the Aadhaar system can improve. While encryption protects data in transit and storage, the centralized nature of Aadhaar’s database remains a point of vulnerability. Any breach of the central repository could potentially expose millions of biometric records. Additionally, though virtual IDs offer an alternative, awareness and adoption of this feature remain low among the general population, reducing its effectiveness as a protective measure.

To enhance technological safeguards further, India could adopt more advanced PETs such as differential privacy, which allows data to be used for analysis without exposing individual identities. Decentralizing data storage and employing advanced biometric encryption methods, such as biometric templates that cannot be reverse-engineered, could also help improve security. By constantly evolving these technologies and adopting global best practices, Aadhaar can better safeguard the privacy and security of its users.

AMLEGALS Remarks

Aadhaar has undoubtedly revolutionized India’s digital identity landscape, providing a streamlined mechanism for accessing government services, financial systems, and welfare programs. However, its vast reach and extensive use of biometric data raise significant privacy concerns. While Aadhaar plays a crucial role in India’s digital infrastructure, its widespread integration must be balanced with robust privacy safeguards.

The evolution of India’s regulatory framework, including the DPDPA, is a step toward addressing these concerns, but gaps remain. Technological safeguards, such as encryption, tokenization, and PETs, are vital, yet further advancements are necessary to fully protect users’ sensitive information. As Aadhaar continues to evolve in a privacy-conscious world, India’s regulatory and technological landscape must adapt to ensure a stronger commitment to privacy. This will require the Government to invest in both legal reforms and advanced technological solutions.

Team AMLEGALS assisted by Ms. Priyanka Thiya (Intern)

For any queries or feedback, feel free to connect to mridusha.guha@amlegals.com or liza.vanjani@amlegals.com