Introduction
The legal status of cryptocurrencies in India has long existed within a zone of ambiguity, creating uncertainty for enterprises, custodians, exchanges, and investors seeking clarity on the classification, ownership, and enforceability of rights with respect to cryptocurrencies. This uncertainty has now been fundamentally changed by the landmark ruling of the Madras High Court in Rhutikumari v. Zanmai Labs Pvt. Ltd (O.A. No. 194 of 2025) dated October 25, 2025, wherein the Court finally settled any doubt regarding the status of cryptocurrencies under Indian law, holding that they qualified as property. Specifically, the Court held that users have identifiable proprietary rights over their digital holdings, imparting much-needed judicial recognition that indeed cryptocurrencies are not mere speculative instruments but protectable assets within the legal realm.
Equally important is the Court’s reiteration of the jurisdiction of Indian courts under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Hereinafter referred to as the “A&C Act”), for seeking interim relief over contracts providing for arbitration seated outside India. This ensures that domestic courts may issue interim protections to safeguard cryptocurrency assets, and foreign arbitration clauses cannot therefore be used to escape judicial scrutiny in India. This decision is a watershed, as it connects technological innovation with legal enforceability, allowing digital assets to be integrated into corporate balance sheets, treasury structures, and governance frameworks with far greater certainty.
The rise of digital assets in corporate and fintech ecosystems
Today, digital assets form the central component of modern business architecture, marked by a shift from exploratory use to operational integration throughout. This enables a faster and more efficient cross-border settlement without depending greatly on traditional correspondent banking networks, it therefore gives an enterprise greater control over liquidity and optimizes capital. Their utility is increasingly reflected in global supply chains as their tokenized records ensure transparency, immutable provenance, and seamless compliance reporting.
Tokenization has also reinvented strategies for capital formation. Offering fractional ownership and audit trails, blockchain-based fundraising models have drawn credibility from investors and regulatory bodies alike. Simultaneously, the ecosystems of customer engagement centered around digital tokens have created more depth in loyalty, more brand connection, and promoted repeated interactions by embedding value-rich digital incentives within corporate platforms. From manufacturing and retail to fintech and logistics, digital assets have become increasingly strategic enablers, aligning with global trends of digitalization.
Legal and governance consequences of recognizing cryptocurrency as property
The Court’s recognition of cryptocurrencies as property has significant implications for corporate governance, custody models, contract frameworks, and risk allocation. Such recognition places the fiduciary burden on exchanges and custodians to maintain absolute segregation of users’ assets. It emphatically highlights that users’ assets must not be commingled, reused, or transferred to absorb losses incurred by other users. This constitutes a violation of proprietary rights and leaves the platforms with unprecedented legal repercussions. Therefore, custodians will need to implement clearly transparent and efficient asset segregation practices, underpinned by well-documented ownership records.
The Court’s reliance on Section 9 of the A&C Act for interim protection, even in foreign-seated arbitrations, cements the status of crypto-asset rights in India. The clauses on dispute resolution, risk-sharing, and contract terms related to digital asset freezing/restructuring need to be revisited in light of legal defensibility. Any contractual ambiguity that undermines user ownership or asset protection will fall prey to judicial scrutiny. Therefore, exchanges, fintech platforms, and enterprise custodians will have to realign their governance structures, cybersecurity measures, and contractual provisions in light of the changed status of digital assets as recognized property.
Compliance, accounting, and taxation alignment under the income tax regime
The ruling aligns naturally with the existing statutory classification of VDAs under Section 2(47A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter referred to as the “ITA”). With VDAs taxed at a flat 30 percent on gains, enterprises must maintain appropriate valuation methodologies, keep adequate audit trails, and adopt effective reporting mechanisms. The recognition of cryptocurrencies as property further reinforces the need for businesses to adopt robust financial controls, impairment assessments, and compliance documentation for their digital asset operations.
Beyond taxation, enterprises must embed digital-asset governance within their internal compliance frameworks, particularly with regard to Anti-Money Laundering and Know-Your-Customer requirements. The ruling places digital-asset management squarely within the realm of mainstream corporate compliance, requiring substantially developed internal control systems, periodic audits, board-level awareness, and adherence to sector-specific regulatory expectations.
Strategic shift for market participants and digital-asset innovation
This order of the Madras High Court enhances market confidence in digital assets by providing legal certainty regarding their treatment and enforceability. It legitimizes the operational models of exchanges, custody providers, tokenization platforms, and blockchain-based SaaS providers that aim for institutional-grade adoptions. With a recognized property framework now in place, businesses can consider strategic scaling, cross-collaboration, and innovation with better regulatory alignment and investor assurance.
The ruling is expected to further hasten the pace of regulatory development in India, facilitating licensing regimes, custodianship standards, and oversight mechanisms tailored for the unique demands of digital-asset ecosystems. Organizations that are proactive in adopting transparent custody mechanisms, clear user documentation, rigorous governance structures, and high-compliance operational standards will place themselves at the front of India’s emerging digital-asset economy.
AMLEGALS Remarks
The recognition of cryptocurrency as property by the Madras High Court introduces a seminal development in India’s digital-asset jurisprudence. It establishes a legally enforceable foundation for ownership, governance, custody, and dispute resolution, and facilitates the judiciary’s interpretation to keep pace with the evolving economic realities of digital-asset adoption. The ruling demands sophisticated segregation, documentation, compliance, and financial reporting from enterprises, heralding a new era of accountability and regulatory maturity in the digital-asset ecosystem.
Companies that develop comprehensive governance, thorough reporting, and transparent systems of operation will have a distinct strategic advantage as India moves closer to a more organized and institutionally harmonious digital regulatory environment. Legal preparedness will no longer be merely a compliance requirement but a bedrock of market credibility and a cornerstone of long-term competitiveness.
For any queries or feedback, feel free to connect with hiteashi.desai@amlegals.com or khilansha.mukhija@amlegals.com