“25. If the sequence of events as have been given in the application, rejoinder andsupplementary affidavit areseen in its entirety, this Court has nohesitation to conclude thatnoplausible explanation has beenrendered onrecordqua delay in filing the accompanying objectionsunder Section 34 oftheAct.
26. Leaving everything aside,application at hand along with objections has been filed by Chief Engineer, who otherwise also could have filed the application along with objections on account of his having signed the agreement at the behest of the applicant/objector with the non-applicant/respondent and as such, there was otherwise no occasion, if any, for the applicant/objector to wait for the persons, who were on election duty and for subsequent approvals by Managing Director.