Supreme Court DecisionsSupreme Court of US – Right To Counsel Is Reasonable Competence

November 30, 20150

Supreme Court of United States held that Right to counsel guarantees is reasonable competence and not perfect advocacy”

Reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Maryland that the defense attorney of the respondent were unconstitutionally ineffective, the SC of US while granting the writ of certiorari held that

the defense attorney of the respondent did not provide deficient performance when they failed to uncover the 1991 report and also failed to use the report methodological flaw against the FBI agent on cross-examination.

[Maryland v.James kulbicki, 577 U. S. ____ (2015), decided on 5.10.2015]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2020-21 AMLEGALS Law Firm in Ahmedabad, Mumbai, Kolkata, New Delhi, Bengaluru for IBC, GST, Arbitration, Contract, Due Diligence, Corporate Laws, IPR, White Collar Crime, Litigation & Startup Advisory, Legal Advisory.

 

Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:
    • there has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;
    • user wishes to gain more information about AMLEGALS and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;
  • the information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site does not create any lawyer-client relationship; and that
  • We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused due to any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information, or its interpretation thereof.
However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources.