Vedanta Limited v. Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Court – Delhi High Court Citation – ARB.P. 853/2023 & I.A. 20643/2023 Date – 28.07.2025 The Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that Parties cannot be precluded from Arbitration if there is mere pendency of formal signature by one party and the other party has already signed…
Engineering Projects (India) Limited v. MSA Global LLC (Oman) Court – Delhi High Court Citation – CS(OS) 243/2025 Date – 25.07.2025 The Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that if proceedings are vexatious, anti – arbitration injunction can be granted by the civil courts in a foreign seated arbitration. The Court held, “114. It has…
INTRODUCTION In an era where intellectual property is a cornerstone of business success, safeguarding your brand identity is paramount. A “trademark” is not just a legal formality, it is a strategic asset that can significantly enhance the value of a company. Whether you are launching a new venture, expanding an existing business, or managing a…
Harkisandas Tulsidas Pabari and Anr. v. Rajendra Anandrao Acharya and Ors. Court – Bombay High Court Citation – Arbitration Appeal No. 62 of 2007 and 63 of 2007 Date – 22.07.2025 The Hon’ble Bombay High Court has held that remission of proceedings to the same Arbitrator under Section 33 and 34(4) can only be done…
Britannia Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Citation – W.P. No. 33963 of 2024 Court –Karnataka High Court Date – 18.06.2025 The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court has held that the unilateral debit of disputed interest from the electronic cash ledger, during the pendency of an appeal, is not permissible under Section 107(7)…
INTRODUCTION As data privacy regulations tighten across the globe, businesses are under growing pressure to keep clear, organized records of how they handle personal data. One such tool widely used internationally is the ‘Record of Processing Activities’, commonly referred to as ROPA. Mandated under the European Union’s (hereinafter referred to as “EU”) General Data Protection…
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Kaajal Agarwal v. State Tax Officer, Chennai Writ Petition No. 20985 of 2025, decided on 16.06.2025, concerns a dispute over alleged mismatch of Input Tax Credit (hereinafter referred to as “ITC”) between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for FY 2019–20, leading to a demand under Section 73 of…
Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Berger Paints India Limited Citation – AP-COM/428/2025 Court – Calcutta High Court Date – 21.07.2025 The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court has held that if sufficient cause is shown, an Arbitrator’s mandate can be extended multiple times by the Court under Section 29A(5). The Court held, “10. Thus, in my view, the first…
Disclaimer & Confirmation
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:
However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources.
