Introduction
For ages, proving a bank document during court action used to mean producing a certified copy of the relevant ledger. This model was based on the assumption that the record is kept in a book located in a specific place. Banking today involves core banking processes, UPI, mobile apps, cloud storage and backup sites that may spread the record of one client between several interconnected channels. The Bankers’ Books Evidence Act, 2026 entered into force on October 1, 2026, and replaced the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act of 1891 which did not take into consideration advanced technologies. The new law means that it is no longer enough to determine where the bank document is located; it is necessary to analyse how it was created, kept and stored. The essence of the Act is discussed below, as well as the impact of the change on banks, fintech’s and litigators.
Legislative Background
The Act received approval from the President on 13 August 2026, while a notification issued on 10 September 2026 specified that commencement of the Act would be on 1 October 2026. The Act abolishes the 1891 Act but with the provision of certain savings that cover any rights, obligations, actions, certifications, or decisions enjoyed under the 1891 Act. As a result, ongoing proceedings are not hampered due to the fact that the previous legislation was scrapped. The 1891 Act was not completely oblivious to innovations in the field of technology. It specified a definition of the bankers’ books including such records as those kept in paper form as well as some other forms of records kept on microfilm, magnetic tape, and various electronic and mechanical means.
However, the problem is mainly of adaptation. The old definition and the old procedure relied on principles and ideas focused on the ability to identify the book while modern banking has a more complicated nature of acquiring, storing, and retrieving information. The Act retains the core of the 1891 scheme, namely proof of banking records through certified copies, and modernises it for electronic and digital records.
Wider Meaning of “Bankers’ Books” and Scope of Application
“Bankers’ books” consist of ledgers, day-books, cash-books, and account books, records used in the course of the bank’s business, which can be kept in written or in paper form or stored in any data storage. Moreover, the Commentary on the Act states that the definition specifically includes records stored at the base, off base, in virtual or cloud locations, as well as at backup and disaster-recovery locations. Consequently, the legal status of the record does not depend anymore on its location. As for the scope of the Act, it is important to note that the law covers all legal procedures, arbitrations, and any inquiries or investigations under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, or any law where the testimony can be taken. The presence of arbitration and inquiries is crucial since the bank records are needed for investigation and not during the trial.
Electronic Records and Conditions for Admissibility
The key point is that the presence of an electronic copy of a banker’s book is not a reason for rejecting it. This copy is declared admissible and valid as being a piece of evidence, provided that it satisfies several requirements: it is a proper copy of the record; no alterations in the data took place; and there were no interruptions or issues affecting the operation of the system.
Section 7 further explains the mentioned above conditions in more detail. It states, among other things, that the process of storing one’s data must have been carried out routinely, correctly, and with the participation of authorised people. In the case the process of storing the data has been carried out through several different systems or intermediaries, they can be treated as one. Thus, the task of the court is not only to check whether a document exists, but also to specify who created it, how it was stored, whether it was changed, and whether the system is trustworthy.
Certification and Evidentiary Value
The Act creates a uniform standard for certification and enables authentication using manual, digital and electronic signatures. It has been reported that there are two formats for different types of certificates available in the two Schedules. One deals with the physical forms of documents, and the other deals with electronic form certificates. The Central Government is empowered to change the formats.
The certified copy is said to be prima facie proof of the said entry. However, that does not constitute conclusive proof, and the other party can challenge the proof before the court. The Act also does not remove the distinction between admissibility and proof. A record may be admitted and still carry little weight if its integrity is credibly challenged.
Protection of Bank Officers and “Special Cause”
Since electronic data is verifiable using an authenticated document, normally, a bank official cannot be required to present the banker’s book or testify as a witness, especially in cases when the bank is not involved as a party. However, the Act allows the court to order the appearance of a bank official only in the circumstances when the entry cannot be verified with certainty, regular performance is interrupted by a specific event, or if the bank did not comply with the requirement of a previous court order to produce certified documents. The plaintiff can also file an application with the court for inspection of entries of the banker’s book.
Extension to Other Financial Sector Entities
This Act keeps the provisions of the 1891 Act regarding the entities engaged in banking business or in the case of a post office savings banks and money order offices. Additionally, it provides liberty to the Government to extend the Act with notice to any entities or type of entities in the financial sector subject to some conditions, exceptions or modifications. The power of extension is especially relevant to other financial services and payment entities since the Act does not directly apply to them.
AMLEGALS Remarks
The Act indicates that Courts are expected to look not only at the information contained in bank records, but more importantly, at the system that produced it, namely, who accessed this info, how modifications were carried out and whether the system in question was secure enough at the relevant moment in time. Banks should re-evaluate their practices that relate to the production, retention and authentication of electronic records, and should also seek to identify the officials who are entitled to authenticate records, set up access control logs and ensure that every instance of breaches of security issues is recorded so that the authenticity of records for those periods can be maintained.
For any queries or feedback, feel free to connect with Hiteashi.desai@amlegals.com